PaloT wrote:
>
> Hi Patrik,
> I'm reusing smartclient-bt project as business tier project in other
> projects. I found that persistent unit generated in parent project
> contains entities also from smartclient-bt project.
>
That must be a bug. I have changed in JPA.xpt so that external modules are
excluded. Please verify and test with smartclient.
PaloT wrote:
>
> Only problem which
> I feel is that AccessFactory implementations have name of unit manager
> hard coded. e.g. from GuiDataSourceAccessFactoryImpl:
>
> @PersistenceContext(unitName =
> "SmartlientGuiPartEntityManagerFactory")
> protected void setEntityManager(EntityManager entityManager) {
> this.entityManager = entityManager;
> }
>
>
The unit name is defined in
extensions::helper::persistenceUnitName(Application app)
You can do an around of that to redefine the unit name in smartclient-bt.
PaloT wrote:
>
>
> Can't we generate it without unitName? Do you know about any reason
> why we need unitName? Shouldn't we wave default EntityManager and
> avoid creating two EntityManagers?
>
> TNX
>
> Pavel
>
>
No, it should be possible to define several units, to be able to use several
databases in same app. I did that on based on customer request, so don't
change.
/Patrik
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Reusing-BT-projects-tp28510832s17564p28513745.html
Sent from the Fornax-Platform mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Fornax-developer mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fornax-developer
