You mean that step 6 and 8 does the same thing? Yes, we could remove one of the constraint checks but since the model is modified by a transformation inbetween (step 7) we want to be sure that the model is correct. Especially since it is possible for users to do additional things in the transformation step it can be good to be on the safe side.
The constraint check is actually rather quick so it is not a big performance gain to remove it. /Patrik MasterBoy wrote: > > Hi all, > > I have a question about the model generated from the DSL model of sculptor > which is conform to sculptormetamodel. my question this second model which > is used to generate the code is an XMI file? > > because i have to explain how sculptor work to my teacher and this point > is not clear for me. > > I saw the schema (Figure 1) in : > > http://fornax.itemis.de/confluence/display/fornax/7.+Developer's+Guide+(CSC) > http://fornax.itemis.de/confluence/display/fornax/7.+Developer's+Guide+(CSC) > > but the number 6 is ambiguous > can some explain me more please > -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/How-Dsl-model-transformed-to-code-generation-model--tp28828802s17564p28835276.html Sent from the Fornax-Platform mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo _______________________________________________ Fornax-developer mailing list Fornax-developer@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fornax-developer
