[Patch, fortran] PR100110 - Parameterized Derived Types, problems with global variable

[Paul Richard Thomas via Fortran]

Hi All,

I was just about to announce that I will only do backports and regressions,
while I finally attack the fundamental problem with the representation of
Parameterized Derived Types. Then this PR came up that was such clear low
hanging fruit that I decided to fix it right away.

Regtests on FC33/x86_64 - OK for mainline?

Note that this is sufficiently safe that it could be applied to 11-branch
right now. However, I am prepared to hold off until 11-branch is released.

Regards

Paul

Fortran: Fix host associated PDT entity initialization [PR99307].

2021-04-19  Paul Thomas  <pa...@gcc.gnu.org>

gcc/fortran
PR fortran/100110
* trans-decl.c (gfc_get_symbol_decl): Replace test for host
association with a check that the current and symbol namespaces
are the same.

gcc/testsuite/
PR fortran/100110
* gfortran.dg/pdt_31.f03: New test.
* gfortran.dg/pdt_26.f03: Reduce 'builtin_malloc' count from 9
to 8.

diff --git a/gcc/fortran/trans-decl.c b/gcc/fortran/trans-decl.c
index 34a0d49bae7..cc9d85543ca 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/trans-decl.c
+++ b/gcc/fortran/trans-decl.c
@@ -1548,7 +1548,8 @@ gfc_get_symbol_decl (gfc_symbol * sym)
      declaration of the entity and memory allocated/deallocated.  */
   if ((sym->ts.type == BT_DERIVED || sym->ts.type == BT_CLASS)
       && sym->param_list != NULL
-      && !(sym->attr.host_assoc || sym->attr.use_assoc || sym->attr.dummy))
+      && gfc_current_ns == sym->ns
+      && !(sym->attr.use_assoc || sym->attr.dummy))
     gfc_defer_symbol_init (sym);
 
   /* Dummy PDT 'len' parameters should be checked when they are explicit.  */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pdt_26.f03 b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pdt_26.f03
index bf1273743d3..59ddcfb6cc4 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pdt_26.f03
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pdt_26.f03
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 ! { dg-options "-fdump-tree-original" }
 !
 ! Test the fix for PR83567 in which the parameterized component 'foo' was
-! being deallocated before return from 'addw', with consequent segfault in 
+! being deallocated before return from 'addw', with consequent segfault in
 ! the main program.
 !
 ! Contributed by Berke Durak  <berke.du...@gmail.com>
@@ -43,4 +43,4 @@ program test_pdt
   if (any (c(1)%foo .ne. [13,15,17])) STOP 2
 end program test_pdt
 ! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "__builtin_free" 8 "original" } }
-! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "__builtin_malloc" 9 "original" } }
+! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "__builtin_malloc" 8 "original" } }

pdt_31.f03
Description: Binary data