AFAICS current trunk still has this issue.
Any takers?
thanks,
On Sun, 2 Sep 2018 17:16:07 +0200
Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <rep.dot....@gmail.com> wrote:
> i spotted one
> (pre-existing) possible inconsistency that i did overlook back then:
>
> gfc_match_associate () reads
> ...
> if (gfc_match (" %e", &newAssoc->target) != MATCH_YES)
> {
> /* Have another go, allowing for procedure pointer selectors. */
> gfc_matching_procptr_assignment = 1;
> if (gfc_match (" %e", &newAssoc->target) != MATCH_YES)
> {
> gfc_error ("Invalid association target at %C");
> goto assocListError;
> }
> gfc_matching_procptr_assignment = 0;
> }
>
> i.e. we retry a match, but in the second attempt we turn on procptr
> assignment matching and if that works, we turn procptr assignment
> matching off again.
> But if we fail that retry, we forget to turn it off again.
> I suppose we should:
>
> $ svn diff -x -p gcc/fortran/match.c
> Index: gcc/fortran/match.c
> ===================================================================
> --- gcc/fortran/match.c (revision 264040)
> +++ gcc/fortran/match.c (working copy)
> @@ -1898,13 +1898,16 @@ gfc_match_associate (void)
> if (gfc_match (" %e", &newAssoc->target) != MATCH_YES)
> {
> /* Have another go, allowing for procedure pointer selectors. */
> + match m;
> +
> gfc_matching_procptr_assignment = 1;
> - if (gfc_match (" %e", &newAssoc->target) != MATCH_YES)
> + m = gfc_match (" %e", &newAssoc->target);
> + gfc_matching_procptr_assignment = 0;
> + if (m != MATCH_YES)
> {
> gfc_error ("Invalid association target at %C");
> goto assocListError;
> }
> - gfc_matching_procptr_assignment = 0;
> }
> newAssoc->where = gfc_current_locus;
>
>
> Untested. Maybe someone wants to give it a whirl...
> If it wrecks havoc then leaving it set deliberately deserves at least a
> comment.
>
> PS: It would be nice to get rid of gfc_matching_procptr_assignment,
> gfc_matching_ptr_assignment, gfc_matching_prefix, FWIW.
> cheers,
> >
> > Thanks everyone!
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Janus
