There are various solutions to install gfortran (or in general the GCC compiler suite) on Windows: Cygwin and MinGW-w64/MSYS2 are both environments that mimick to a certain extent Linux and allow you to manage all manner of packages, among which the GCC compiler suite. I use both but I also use the installation from equation.com - http://www.equation.com/servlet/equation.cmd?fa=fortran. You can get Intel Fortran oneAPI from Intel - https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/developer/tools/oneapi/fortran-compiler.html#gs.xy9u8f.
General questions about Fortran: the comp.lang.fortran newsgroup or, a bit more modern, Fortran discourse - https://fortran-lang.discourse.group/ Regards, Arjen Op ma 25 apr. 2022 om 12:41 schreef William Carter <carterw...@yahoo.com>: > Hello. I have a windows 10 home 64 bit operating system. Thanks for > getting back to me > > Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android > <https://go.onelink.me/107872968?pid=InProduct&c=Global_Internal_YGrowth_AndroidEmailSig__AndroidUsers&af_wl=ym&af_sub1=Internal&af_sub2=Global_YGrowth&af_sub3=EmailSignature> > > On Sun, Apr 24, 2022 at 9:39, Arjen Markus > <arjen.markus...@gmail.com> wrote: > MicroSoft's Fortran compiler is a very old compiler that has not been > maintained in a very long time. The gfortran compiler and the Intel Fortran > oneAPI compiler, both freely available, would easily handle such arrays as > you mention. What system are you running on? > > Regards, > > Arjen > > Op vr 22 apr. 2022 om 22:46 schreef William Carter via Fortran < > fortran@gcc.gnu.org>: > > Hello, > > I am an engineer for the nuclear power industry. As part of my master’s > thesis I developed a model of a fuel pin using Fortran. At the time I was > working with a cheap Microsoft compiler. It was version 5.1 if I remember > correctly. My model does 3D finite differencing and is rather demanding on > the compiler. My Microsoft compiler was pretty limiting on the size of the > modules I could compile. Typically I was working with a 7x7x7 spatial > array with a 5 properties at each node. Everything was in double > precision. So it was 7x7x7x5. I could juggle these around, but I had to > say within this maximum or the compiler would not work. I would like to > work with MUCH larger arrays. I am thinking 100x100x100x5. Again in > double precision. So I need a better compiler. Can you help? > > Regards, > > Bill Carter > > > Sent from Mail for Windows > >
