On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 20:03:55 +0200 Thomas Koenig <tkoe...@netcologne.de> wrote:
> On 28.04.22 19:17, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: > > ISTM that this should be s/mod.e/mode./ ? > > Yep, fixed as obvious and simple on trunk with > r13-49-g4a8b45e8bc8246bd141dad65f571a3e0cc499c6b . thanks! > > OK for backport to gcc-12? (This is both extremely safe and > not particularly important :-) I'd say yes because it's 1) doc 2) trivial 3) obvious :) But formally, i think RM approval is needed ATM. Richard?
