On Sun, Sep 18, 2022 at 08:10:00PM +0100, Julian Brown wrote: > I don't think any ATTACH clauses can appear during > the gimplify_adjust_omp_clause_1 walk. So, how about this?
LGTM, thanks.
Jakub
- Re: [PATCH v3 02/11] Remove omp_target_reor... Jakub Jelinek via Fortran
- [PATCH v3 04/11] OpenMP/OpenACC: mapping group l... Julian Brown
- Re: [PATCH v3 04/11] OpenMP/OpenACC: mappin... Jakub Jelinek via Fortran
- [PATCH v3 01/11] OpenMP 5.0: Clause ordering for... Julian Brown
- Re: [PATCH v3 01/11] OpenMP 5.0: Clause ord... Jakub Jelinek via Fortran
- [PATCH v3 03/11] OpenMP/OpenACC struct sibling l... Julian Brown
- Re: [PATCH v3 03/11] OpenMP/OpenACC struct ... Jakub Jelinek via Fortran
- [PATCH v3 05/11] OpenMP: push attaches to end of... Julian Brown
- Re: [PATCH v3 05/11] OpenMP: push attaches ... Jakub Jelinek via Fortran
- Re: [PATCH v3 05/11] OpenMP: push attac... Julian Brown
- Re: [PATCH v3 05/11] OpenMP: push a... Jakub Jelinek via Fortran
- [PATCH v3 06/11] OpenMP: Pointers and member map... Julian Brown
- Re: [PATCH v3 06/11] OpenMP: Pointers and m... Jakub Jelinek via Fortran
- Re: [PATCH v3 06/11] OpenMP: Pointers a... Julian Brown
- Re: [PATCH v3 06/11] OpenMP: Pointe... Jakub Jelinek via Fortran
- Re: [PATCH v3 06/11] OpenMP: Po... Julian Brown
- Re: [PATCH v3 06/11] OpenM... Jakub Jelinek via Fortran
- Re: [PATCH v3 06/11] OpenM... Tobias Burnus
- Re: [PATCH v3 06/11] O... Julian Brown
- Re: [PATCH v3 06/11] O... Tobias Burnus
- Re: [PATCH v3 06/11] O... Tobias Burnus
