Dear All,

sorry for attaching the wrong patch - this time it is the correct one!

Harald

On 10/11/23 21:39, Harald Anlauf wrote:
Dear All,

the attached trivial patch fixes (= catches) a forgotten corner-case
in the detection of a name conflict between an internal procedure and
a local declaration for the case that the latter is a derived type.
Another torture test by Gerhard... ;-)  Used to ICE previously.

Regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.  OK for mainline?

Thanks,
Harald

From 84de03c97f899df91f2b7e7af4a5bbc09412a3fe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Harald Anlauf <anl...@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2023 21:29:35 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Fortran: name conflict between internal procedure and derived
 type [PR104351]

gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:

	PR fortran/104351
	* decl.cc (get_proc_name): Extend name conflict detection between
	internal procedure and previous declaration also to derived type.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

	PR fortran/104351
	* gfortran.dg/derived_function_interface_1.f90: Adjust pattern.
	* gfortran.dg/pr104351.f90: New test.
---
 gcc/fortran/decl.cc                                |  4 +++-
 .../gfortran.dg/derived_function_interface_1.f90   |  2 +-
 gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr104351.f90             | 14 ++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr104351.f90

diff --git a/gcc/fortran/decl.cc b/gcc/fortran/decl.cc
index 4a3c5b86de0..bdd3be32a46 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/decl.cc
+++ b/gcc/fortran/decl.cc
@@ -1404,7 +1404,9 @@ get_proc_name (const char *name, gfc_symbol **result, bool module_fcn_entry)
       /* Trap declarations of attributes in encompassing scope.  The
 	 signature for this is that ts.kind is nonzero for no-CLASS
 	 entity.  For a CLASS entity, ts.kind is zero.  */
-      if ((sym->ts.kind != 0 || sym->ts.type == BT_CLASS)
+      if ((sym->ts.kind != 0
+	   || sym->ts.type == BT_CLASS
+	   || sym->ts.type == BT_DERIVED)
 	  && !sym->attr.implicit_type
 	  && sym->attr.proc == 0
 	  && gfc_current_ns->parent != NULL
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/derived_function_interface_1.f90 b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/derived_function_interface_1.f90
index 24a00950912..5438ad49c6a 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/derived_function_interface_1.f90
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/derived_function_interface_1.f90
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ end function ext_fun
 
 contains
 
-  type(foo) function fun() ! { dg-error "already has an explicit interface" }
+  type(foo) function fun() ! { dg-error "has an explicit interface" }
   end function fun  ! { dg-error "Expecting END PROGRAM" }
 
 end
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr104351.f90 b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr104351.f90
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..86b47e03340
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr104351.f90
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+! { dg-do compile }
+! PR fortran/104351
+! Contributed by G.Steinmetz
+
+program p
+  implicit none
+  type t
+  end type
+  type(t) :: f
+contains
+  real function f() result(z) ! { dg-error "has an explicit interface" }
+    z = 0.0                   ! { dg-error "assignment" }
+  end function f              ! { dg-error "Expecting END PROGRAM" }
+end
-- 
2.35.3

Reply via email to