Hi Rimvydas!
Am 28.12.23 um 08:09 schrieb Rimvydas Jasinskas:
On Wed, Dec 27, 2023 at 10:34 PM Harald Anlauf <anl...@gmx.de> wrote:
The patch is almost fine, except for a strange wording here:
+@smallexample
+gfortran -save-temps -c foo.F90
+@end smallexample
+
+preprocesses to in @file{foo.fii}, compiles to an intermediate
+@file{foo.s}, and then assembles to the (implied) output file
+@file{foo.o}, whereas:
I understand the formulation is copied from gcc/doc/invoke.texi,
where it does not fully make sense to me either.
How about:
"preprocesses input file @file{foo.F90} to @file{foo.fii}, ..."
Furthermore,
+@smallexample
+gfortran -save-temps -S foo.F
+@end smallexample
+
+saves the (no longer) temporary preprocessed file in @file{foo.fi}, and
+then compiles to the (implied) output file @file{foo.s}.
Even if this is copied from the gcc texinfo file, how about:
"saves the preprocessor output in @file{foo.fi}, ..."
which I find easier to read.
Can you also add a reference to the PR number in the commit message?
I agree, wording sounds a lot better, included in v2 together with PR number.
Yes, this is OK.
Pushed: https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2cb93e6686e4af5725d8c919cf19f535a7f3aa33
Thanks for the patch!
Is there a specific reason thy -fc-prototypes (Interoperability
Options section) is excluded from manpage?
Can you be more specific? I get here (since gcc-9):
% man /opt/gcc/14/share/man/man1/gfortran.1 |grep -A 1 "Interoperability
Options"
Interoperability Options
-fc-prototypes -fc-prototypes-external
although no detailed explanation (-> gfortran.info).
The https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gfortran/Invoking-GNU-Fortran.html
does contain a working link to
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gfortran/Interoperability-Options.html
However the manpage has Interoperability section explicitly disabled
with "@c man end" ... "@c man begin ENVIRONMENT".
After digging into git log it seems that Interoperability section was
unintentionally added after this comment mark in
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commitdiff;h=e655a6cc43
Yes, that might have been unintentional.
Can you open a PR, and if you have a fix, attach it there?
Thanks,
Harald
Best regards,
Rimvydas
