Dear all,
the attached patch fixes invalid Fortran in testcase
gfortran.dg/pr101026.f, which might prohibit progress
in fixing pr111781. (Note that the testcase was for a
tree-optimizer issue, not the Fortran frontend.)
OK for mainline?
Will commit within 24h unless there are comments.
Thanks,
Harald
From 75724b6b42a1c46383d8e6deedbfb8d2ebd0fa12 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Harald Anlauf <anl...@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 21:51:53 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Fortran testsuite: fix invalid Fortran in testcase
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gfortran.dg/pr101026.f: Let variables used in specification
expression be passed as dummy arguments
---
gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr101026.f | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr101026.f b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr101026.f
index 9576d8802ca..e05e21c898a 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr101026.f
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr101026.f
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
! { dg-do compile }
! { dg-options "-Ofast -frounding-math" }
- SUBROUTINE PASSB4 (CC,CH)
+ SUBROUTINE PASSB4 (CC,CH,IDO,L1)
DIMENSION CC(IDO,4,L1), CH(IDO,L1,*)
DO 103 I=2,IDO,2
TI4 = CC0-CC(I,4,K)
--
2.35.3
