Hi Andre, After a false start, the patch was applied to mainline, did what it was supposed to do and regtests fine.
Ok for mainline. Thanks Paul On Fri, 18 Jul 2025 at 13:42, Andre Vehreschild <ve...@gmx.de> wrote: > Hi all, hi Harald, > > attached patch fixes a runtime out-of-bounds error when an iterator of an > implied do-loop was not substituted as expected. The resulting code would > still > use the uninitialized iterator variable which then lead to out-of-bounds > accesses. > > Harald, I did not look at the patch you put into the PR and reported to > have > got stuck on just to not suffer from the same fate. Unfortunately I did > just > the same with the same insufficient result. It took me a lot of head > scratching > to come up with the this solution. Please have an in-depth look into it. > > Regtests fine on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu / F41. Ok for mainline? > > Regards, > Andre > -- > Andre Vehreschild * Email: vehre ad gmx dot de >
