Hello world,
the attached patch mentions -fexternal-blas64 in the changes.html file
for gcc16. Checked with "tidy -e" and by visual inspection with Firefox.
Any comments or suggestions for better wording? OK to commit?
Best regards
Thomas
diff --git a/htdocs/gcc-16/changes.html b/htdocs/gcc-16/changes.html
index d21eac62..a4b31816 100644
--- a/htdocs/gcc-16/changes.html
+++ b/htdocs/gcc-16/changes.html
@@ -123,6 +123,11 @@ for general information.</p>
<li>Fortran 2023: The <code>split</code> intrinsic subroutine is now
supported and <code>c_f_pointer</code> now accepts an optional
lower bound as a argument.</li>
+ <li>The <code>-fexternal-blas64</code> option has been added to call
+ external BLAS routines with 64-bit integer arguments for
+ <code>MATMUL</code>. This option is only valid for
+ 64-bit systems and when <code>-ffrontend-optimize</code> is
+ in effect.</li>
</ul>
<!-- <h3 id="go">Go</h3> -->
