On 9/24/25 11:56 AM, Harald Anlauf wrote:
Dear All,
debugging this PR sent me deep into the woods. To find where things
went wrong, I ran two parallel gdb sessions on a testcase once with
character(kind=1) and with character(kind=4), and found that the
code diverged in get_array_span, as the TYPE_STRING_FLAG was set
for the former but not set for the latter.
I did not find why it was set at all for the former, but decided
that it should be set for all character types. That fixed it.
(If someone thinks that I am wrong, please speak up!)
This allowed to disable the temporary workarounds I put in
testcase deferred_character_39.f90, so this should guarantee
that the present fix works and does not break something obvious.
Regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. OK for mainline?
And for joint backport with the fix for pr108581 to 15-branch?
Thanks,
Harald
Yes, OK and for backport.
Thanks,
Jerry
