On 10/1/25 11:42 PM, Paul Richard Thomas wrote:
Hi All,

The comment in the patch and the ChangeLog explains this one and a
half liner adequately. The irony is that the error test was removed
because an error return was being called, which caused failures in
valid cases.

Regtests on FC42/x86_64. Variants of the testcase, mentioned in the
PR, have been tested. OK for mainline?

Paul

Tested here OK.

Yes, OK for mainline. Once again thank you!

Jerry

Reply via email to