On 10/11/25 5:17 AM, Paul Richard Thomas wrote:
Hi All,
These fixes are minor on the scale of things and fix no fewer than
three problems (2 PRs):
(i) PR95543 exposed two separate bugs. The first was that default
initializer expressions that are not constants, were not being
expanded so that the name of the PDT instance could not be generated
and an ICE was caused downstream. This is fixed by the first two
chunks in the patch. Once this was fixed, comparison with other brands
showed the testcase failing at the declaration " type(t()) :: z"
because the type specification list is empty, contrary to F2023 R755:
type-param-spec is [ keyword = ] type-param-value. This is fixed
by the chunk in primary.cc.
(ii) PR103748 was due to type spec lists being applied to derived
types that are not parameterized. This is fixed by the third chunk.
Regtests with FC42/x86_64 - OK for mainline?
Paul
Looks good to go Paul. Tests OK here as well.
Thanks,
Jerry
