It already appears on the 'ICE on invalid' list, of which there are 125 other PRs :-(
However, I have noted your interest and the patch posted on the PR. Regards Paul On Fri, 17 Apr 2026 at 15:01, NightStrike <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Apr 17, 2026 at 05:01 Paul Richard Thomas > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Several of us have been engaged in a campaign to fix as many gfortran >> regressions as possible before the gcc-16 release. This activity was >> triggered by Christopher Albert, who not only came up with plethora of >> fixes but also testcases for PRs that had already been fixed; often by >> unidentified patches. >> >> At present there are 17 regressions left, of which only 4 remain for >> gcc-16. Some of the batches do not apply cleanly to gcc-13 but as the >> backporting goes on, we will likely close those ones anyway unless an >> easy fixup is identified. We anticipate, then, that there will be 4 >> open fortran regressions by the end of this month. >> >> The current status is summarised below: >> >> That said, we shouldn't rest on our laurels; there are 151 open bugs >> that are labelled as wrong code! > > > Could you add this to your list? > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99506
