Sorry, the subject line is wrong in my posting of 15 minutes ago. Paul
On Thu, 17 Sept 2026 at 08:01, Paul Richard Thomas <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello All, > > The fix for this PR turned into a catch-all for parameterized string > components: > > Apart from the third chunk, the patch recognises fully that > pdt_strings are represented by descriptors. The third chunk corrects > an incorrect fail, when gfc_dep_compare_expr returns -3 for unlike > variables. This is overly restrictive and should be subject to a > runtime check. > > The test, pdt_95.f03, grew like Topsy but clearly identifies the > original report from wrinkles that have been fixed. > > It passes regression testing on FC44/x86_64 - OK for mainline and > after a decent interval, 16-branch? > > Regards > > Paul
