Hi,

so I've read (hopefully) all forum threads concerning the absence of complex 
numbers in GAP. I know that there are alternatives, eg. cyclotomic fields and 
algebraic extensions of the Rationals. But since I am rather unexperienced in 
using GAP, I would like to know to what extent these "workarounds" can replace 
complex numbers, especially when I want to work with Lie algebras over a 
complex field.

What I want to do with GAP is the following: Given a set of complex square 
matrices, find out if they form a vectorspace under repeated commutation, i.e. 
a Lie algebra. In other words, do these given matrices generate a Lie algebra 
under repeated commutation?

Since these matrices can be large, I am looking for an efficient way to deal 
with this problem and I was hoping that GAP would be well suited. But then I 
discovered that there were no complex numbers in GAP, and "the workarounds" 
might prevent an efficient computation (or a computation at all)...

Comments welcome! :-)




      Lesen Sie Ihre E-Mails jetzt einfach von unterwegs.
www.yahoo.de/go
_______________________________________________
Forum mailing list
Forum@mail.gap-system.org
http://mail.gap-system.org/mailman/listinfo/forum

Reply via email to