Dear Protel users,

"Ian Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 2001-06-06 06:46:46 PM quickly
responded:
>must-have - correct snap to the
>intersection of two lines.

Currently we can only snap to stuff on the current layer. Would you continue
this so I can snap where 2 lines cross on the silkscreen layer, but I won't snap
where (say) a line on the top layer crosses a line on the bottom layer ?

...
>I wish there were an option to "toggle all selections". (Similar to ``Select |
>All'', except if something were *already* selected, it would make it not
>selected).
>
>Since this is a standalone command it could be done as a simple enough
>add-on server...  done.
>
>Get it at:
>  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/protel-users/files/ToggleSelectionAll.zip
>Usual warnings - use at your own risk, don't blame me, take care, test on
>non-critical file first.....
>
>Ian Wilson

Wow, that was quick.

I've installed it and did a quick test. Your server seems to work great for me.

I have several component classes, and I intended for each component to be in one
and only one component class. This tool allows me to select /en mass/ every
component that is *not* in *any* component class, making it easy to find those
components and place them in the appropriate class.

I was about to ask for a way to only toggle the selection of components (leaving
traces, free pads, etc. unselected), but I see I can get the same effect with
``ToggleSelectionAll'' followed by ``Deselect | Free Objects''. Then I get
exactly what I was looking for.
Bug report:
It doesn't make any difference for what I'm trying to do, but I can't help but
notice that this process ignores Arcs.

Thanks Ian !

--
David Cary



* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/subscrib.html
*                      - or email -
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=leave%20proteledaforum
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Reply via email to