Might want to try http://gaps.gge.unb.ca/ And the multi-solution comparison centre: http://gge.unb.ca/Resources/PPP/Purpose.html
Another comparison: http://gpsworld.com/a-comparison-of-free-gps-online-post-processing-services/ On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Anders Wallin <anders.e.e.wal...@gmail.com>wrote: > > Thanks for the tip! > By extracting the receiver clock bias from the status-file, and playing > around with the RTKPOST settings I now get better results: > http://imagebin.org/283266 > > There's still a 4 ns offset between the CSRS and RTKLib solutions - I > don't know where it comes from?? > > ESA gLAB arrives at the same result as CSRS, so maybe I will look closely > at the gLAB settings next. > > Thanks for your help - I will try to write a blog post about my findings > if/when I get at least three methods to agree on the results (CSRS, gLAB, > and RTKLIB) > > Anders > > > > On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 12:07 AM, Felipe G. Nievinski < > fgnievin...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I don't think you should use the time tag in the .pos file. >> I'd use instead the CLK records in the .stat file. >> See Appendix B.3 in the docs, "Solution Status File": >> >> *Receiver Clockâbias States* >> *Estimated receiver clock bias parameters. The format of a record is as >> follows.* >> *$CLK,week,tow,stat,rcv,clk1,clk2,clk3,clk4* >> *week/tow : gps week no/time of week (s)* >> *stat : solution status* >> *rcv : receiver (1:rover,2:base station)* >> *clk1 : receiver clock bias GPS (ns)* >> *clk2 : receiver clock bias GLONASS (ns)* >> *clk3 : reserved* >> *clk4 : reserved* >> >> >
_______________________________________________ This message is sent to you from FOSS-GPS@lists.osgeo.org mailing list. Visit http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss-gps to manage your subscription For more information, check http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/FOSS-GPS
