> I have tested few other hypervisoers and for desktop virtualization, > virualbox impressed me a lot . vmware-server is targeted for server > level virtualization which may take a bit more resources ( but i have > no data here). Personally i believe for desktop vmware-workstation Yeah I felt the same until I hit the obsd segfault :-) Like I mentioned previously, vbox does not properly emulate CPU instruction sets(x86 properly) and obsd caught it while doing so. Hence, even simple programs (such as 'cat') were segfaulting in obsd4.5. I feel you are possibly right regarding the resource utilization of VMware server/workstation VS. VirtualBox. In that, VirtualBox occupies less resident memory space than the former and is less resource hungry in general. [...] -- Regards, Ishwor Gurung
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ FOSS Nepal mailing list: foss-nepal@googlegroups.com http://groups.google.com/group/foss-nepal To unsubscribe, e-mail: foss-nepal+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com Mailing List Guidelines: http://wiki.fossnepal.org/index.php?title=Mailing_List_Guidelines Community website: http://www.fossnepal.org/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
