=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ramon_Rib=F3?= <ram...@compassis.com> wrote: > > You can `fossil update` and then `fossil undo`. > > I knew this one, but I would prefer an option that did not change the > files on disk. You know, things sometimes fail, and they can fail in > the middle of the operation. > > This is specially true for a GUI tool that uses fossil and wants to > show to the user what would happen in case of update. Would any user > ever forgive the tool if it accidentally deleted one file in the > course of its automatic operations? >
This was recently requested, see ticket 4d6b7d4e1a, http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/4d6b7d4e1a ... Also, it would be nice to have created a new thread for this subject to make working with threads/subjects/archives easier to deal with. Jeremy _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
