Hi, > As for the case of removing "illegal" insertions, I think it is far better > to have the real history saying "we had these from this date to that date, > as you can see, but you can also see that they were removed at a > particular time and not used thereafter". This follows the accounting > principle that incorrect entries have to be reversed out, not made > invisible. Without this it is not possible to demonstrate how some > situation arose from an action taken while the repository was incorrect. As various people have pointed out, the Copyright material has to actually be removed so that it is no longer distributed (rather that no longer actively used).
The point about accountability is well made though - perhaps the shun action should cause an entry in the timeline at the time the shun is effected, indicating the artifact that was shunned, the parent of the shunned artifact, and a comment (why it was shunned). Regards, Twylite _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
