On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 09:40:55AM +1030, Martin Sandiford wrote:
> I'm in favor.  Not really sure what I need to do to help this to happen?
> 
> Code review anyone?

I would really like something comfortable about that. But I don't have any idea
of how I would like it to be. And more sad, I can imagine implementations I
would not favour.

I find the "direct comments committed on the source files of the branch" hard to
beat.

> On 07/12/2010, at 8:40 PM, Gour wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, 8 Nov 2010 21:51:19 +1030
> >>>>>>> "Martin" == Martin Sandiford wrote:
> >
> > Martin> Changes are on the "experimental" branch.  It's been tested
> > Martin> reasonably well on MacOSX and Linux.  I've implemented a Win32
> > Martin> version as well, but this has really only had basic testing.
> >
> > Is there any chance that it ends applied to the upstream?
> >
> >
> > Sincerely,
> > Gour
> >
> > -- 
> >
> > Gour  | Hlapicina, Croatia  | GPG key: CDBF17CA
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > _______________________________________________
> > fossil-users mailing list
> > fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
> > http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
> 
> _______________________________________________
> fossil-users mailing list
> fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
> http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Reply via email to