Right, okay -- that's fairly reasonable, you couldn't realistically
prepare an attack on a repository then.

(The question of using things that are slower than SHA1 as in my
original post still stands, of course. As you've said, it's definitely
better than some stuff that gets used -- such as the recent Gawker
farce which was unsalted DES IIRC -- but given how easy that attack
was in hindsight, is this good enough?)

thanks for your time an attention,
lvh
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Reply via email to