That doesn't look like the correct fix. A better fix might be not allocating a real shell/tty.
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Ramon Ribó <ram...@compassis.com> wrote: > > I think that it has still some problems. This ticket contains a bug > correction still not applied to the code: > > > http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/884c40589fcee6fa54d18eb3e8db1d1ba337a294 > > RR > > > 2011/2/16 Chad Perrin <c...@apotheon.net> > >> I'm new to this list. Be gentle. >> >> I've been rummaging through the list archives, and sifting through the >> Web documentation, but I am still not clear on the status of using SSH to >> encrypt connections for push/pull and other operations using Fossil. Is >> it stable? Does it require special configuration? Is there anything >> about it in the Web docs or in any documentation that comes with it? Is >> it not discussed outside of the mailing list? >> >> Any help in answering these (and related) questions would be appreciated. >> >> -- >> Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] >> >> _______________________________________________ >> fossil-users mailing list >> fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org >> http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > fossil-users mailing list > fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org > http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users > > -- Justin Mazzi
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
