On 03/29/11 10:16, Paul Ruizendaal wrote: > That being said, I'm opposed to bloat and function creep in Fossil. > Perhaps what is needed is a small companion to Fossil that acts as a hub > server. That companion could be a webserver / sqlite / javascript combo, > which either reads the database files direct, or calls out to Fossil to > perform its operations.
Hrm. Why embed a language for hooks at all? svn/git/etc seem to have managed without... this makes hooks platform-specific (shell scripts are fine for Unix users, less fine on Windows), but as the hooks would presumably be repo-specific rather than part of the global state, is that a problem? > > Paul > ABS -- Alaric Snell-Pym http://www.snell-pym.org.uk/alaric/ _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
