On 22 Jul 2011, at 13:09, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote: > On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 12:36:33PM +0100, Ben Summers wrote: >> >> On 22 Jul 2011, at 12:03, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote: >> >>> On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 01:03:06PM -0400, Martin Gagnon wrote: >>>> Le 2011-07-10 à 11:05, Ben Summers <b...@fluffy.co.uk> a écrit : >>>>> Answering the question about breaking existing scripts, the output is >>>>> identical when used at the root. Unless you're running scripts in a >>>>> sub-directory, nothing needs to change. >>>>> >>>>> Ben >>>>> >>>> >>>> That's true... And I like the latest suggestion as well... >>>> >>> >>> Could someone implement this subdirectory awareness also for "fossil ls"? >> >> Why is that useful? >> >> I'll add it if it is useful, but it's not a command which relates to the >> files you're working on. > > It helps me knowing what is in the repository and what not. Maybe the 'extras' > command could have some kind of subdirectory view too.
I realised that the extras needed to be relative to the current working directory as well as status/changes, so I did that too. It's in both the ben-testing and ben-changes-report branches. > > I use 'fossil ls' with grep from time to time, to know what is upstream and > what > not. Maybe this is a bad way of doing that, I don't know; but it works fine > for > what I've been doing. You should use extras to do this. > >> Is anyone else using the ben-testing branch, with this and the other changes >> I made? (versionable settings, SSL client certs, empty-dirs setting) > > I'm not using it; if you need testers to achieve some consensus for a merge to > trunk, I could spend some time testing the basics at least. That would be wonderful, thank you! Ben -- http://bens.me.uk/ _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
