On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Russ Paielli <[email protected]> wrote: > I am wondering how good Fossil is for code review on a large project. (I am > a Fossil user, but I am currently only using it in the most basic way, for > my own project with no collaboration.)
If your developers are making commits to their own branches, then your review process can selectively merge in the changes that are accepted. As Remigiusz mentioned, tags can be added to a commit to indicate Accept/Reject status from the reviewers. If the consesus is to accept the code, then your integrator can merge in the accepted changes. Since tags can have a value, they can reference a document with a detailed report from the reviewer. _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
