Hi,
I found another copy of the same repository which is up to date and
doesn't have this inconsistency.
This solves my current problem.

BTW, these repositories are quite small (~120K).
If you think that they can be useful for debugging, I can send them to you.

Thank you for your support,
Marco

2011/8/9 Marco Maggesi <marco.magg...@gmail.com>:
> Thank you for your quick answer.
>
> I run test-integrity and I found that both repositories are corrupted.
> One says:
>
> fossil: checksum mismatch on blob rid=58:
> da39a3ee5e6b4b0d3255bfef95601890afd80709 vs
> 01f57728b3a5d55520becb489146d0a7f42f9638
>
> The other says:
>
> skip phantom 177 ccc986b41c2a37fb86a8267d2dd0ac0b17e12bc9
> fossil: checksum mismatch on blob rid=178:
> da39a3ee5e6b4b0d3255bfef95601890afd80709 vs
> 15e01a5726c26fe931d4b833215defd17ec9b3ae
>
> Now what I am supposed to do to try to solve this situation?
> Can I hope to recover from this inconsistency?
> Thanks again.
> M.
>
>
> 2011/8/9 Richard Hipp <d...@sqlite.org>:
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 8:25 AM, Marco Maggesi <marco.magg...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I have two fossil repositories (the "local" one and the "remote" one) and
>>> I get the following error when I try to pull:
>>>  "content does not mach sha1 hash"
>>>
>>> So, first of all, I would like to establish if one or both repositories
>>> are corrupted.
>>> Are there specific commands to check the integrity of a fossil repository?
>>
>> fossil test-integrity
>>
>> There are a lot of "test" commands.  Do "fossil test-commands" to see them
>> all.  But remember:  test-commands are unsupported, might not work, and
>> might change or disappear at any moment.  So don't get emotionally attached
>> to them.  If you really, really need a test-command to be supported, bring
>> it up on this list and we will talk about promoting it regular command.
>>
>>>
>>> I tried
>>> fossil info
>>> fossil rebuild
>>> but none of them seems to be able to detect (nor fix) inconsistencies in
>>> my repositories.
>>>
>>> I use fossil version 1.18 (on both machines).
>>>
>>> Suggestions?
>>>
>>> Thanks in advances.
>>> Marco
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> fossil-users mailing list
>>> fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
>>> http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> D. Richard Hipp
>> d...@sqlite.org
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> fossil-users mailing list
>> fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
>> http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Reply via email to