On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Konstantin Khomoutov <
flatw...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:

> On Sun, 14 Aug 2011 19:16:50 -0700
> Mike Meyer <m...@mired.org> wrote:
>
> [...]
> > If you insist on them being files, then there's not much point in
> > further discussion. And having them in files means you can bring the
> > full power of unix to bear on them (which, of course, is why I want
> > them *out* of my workspace - as they are just noise when working with
> > *my* files), which is hard to argue with.
> >
> > But - any chance of moving them into the wiki? The fossil wiki command
> > would let you work with them with almost the same power at the command
> > line (i.e. - "fossil extras | fossil wiki import settings/ignore_glob"
> > should work), and in return you get to edit the settings via the wiki
> > gui.
> This is a rather beautiful idea but I always thought that wiki in
> fossil is not really versioned and it is also repository-wide (hence
> you woun't be able to have different ignore settings on different
> branches).  Please correct me if I'm wrong. But if I'm not, the idea of
> using wiki for this kind of job won't work.
>

Half right. Wiki pages are versioned, and you can use the UI to go looking
through the older versions, etc. The version of fossil I have here
(downloaded windows binary) doesn't have the ability to deal with wiki pages
by version from the command line, thought it's listed as a TODO.

Their doesn't appear to be any way to branch them, though. So yes, like the
current version settings, you couldn't have different settings for different
branches.
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Reply via email to