On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Martin S. Weber <martin.we...@nist.gov>wrote:
> bindings for WSDL; there is support for mimetypes, and thus > application/json application/x-javascript text/javascript text/x-javascript > (take your pick or use > something completely different ;)) > i think you just found a bug in my code - i've been using "application/javascript" instead of "application/x-javascript". What's even worse, the amount of documentation which now needs to be changed is far larger than the code ;). For the fossil/json response headers we actually try to determine which Content-Type to send based on the Accept header of the client, using one of application/json, application/javascript, or falling back to text/plain if we can't figure out what to do. > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl#_**http <http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl#_http> > [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl Thank you very much :). i'll go get myself more informed on the topic... -- ----- stephan beal http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
