_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Excuse my bluntness: that sounds like a terrible idea. Tcl is huge
compared to fossil, and certainly not installed everywhere by default.
And for what benefit? To have a full-blown programming language built
in? That of course isn't a benefit in itself. If an organization needs
some sort of sophisticated processing attached to a hook, e.g. some
verification on commits, let them call an external program, a shell
script, a tcl script, whatever. Embedding an interpreter into Fossil
itself, to run code called by the hook, seems like entirely the wrong
approach.
- Re: [fossil-users] any interest in integrating jimtcl w/fo... Steve Havelka
- Re: [fossil-users] any interest in integrating jimtcl... Martin S. Weber
- Re: [fossil-users] any interest in integrating jimtcl... Eric
- Re: [fossil-users] any interest in integrating ji... Martin S. Weber
- Re: [fossil-users] any interest in integratin... Mike Meyer
- Re: [fossil-users] any interest in integr... Martin S. Weber
- Re: [fossil-users] any interest in i... Steve Bennett
- Re: [fossil-users] any interest ... Martin S. Weber
- Re: [fossil-users] any inter... Steve Bennett
- Re: [fossil-users] any inter... Martin S. Weber
- Re: [fossil-users] any inter... Stephan Beal