On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 10:50:05AM -0700, Mike Meyer wrote: > 2011/10/19 Lluís Batlle i Rossell <virik...@gmail.com> > > No, I take that back. You could force locking to use a central server model. > For each repository, you have to set a repository as the "lock server". > Using "self" or some such would mean "You are the lock sever". The lock > command could then either handle the lock locally, or request it from a > remote server. Otherwise, you need a distributed lock manager, which is a > hard enough problem to warrant it's own project.
That's what I had in mind - establishing a central repository as lock server. Nothing more. _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
