In fact, the most annoying thing is to go to the files section and find there files of several years ago that are not used anymore, or that come from a mistake and they will remain there for years and years more, making more difficult to review the other files.
The possibility of seeing only the "tip" in that section has somehow alleviated the problem, but this inconvenient still remains there. For me, the "all" subsection of the "files" section should contain all the files of current and previous releases that we have not explicitly marked as of no interest anymore. One possible way of doing this would be to mark some branches as of "no interest" anymore for day to day work, except for archaeological purposes. RR > > 2012/2/28 Konstantin Khomoutov <flatw...@users.sourceforge.net>: >> On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 14:47:00 +0100 >> Ramon Ribó <ram...@compassis.com> wrote: >> >> [...] >>> (9) in the web page, possibility to mark branches as hidden. It will >>> be invisible in the timeline, branches section and files section >>> (files belonging only to hidden branches do not appear), unless a >>> special option to show hidden is selected. (useful to hide mistakes) >> Is this really needed? >> After making a check-in a leaf in the "mistake" branch, close this leaf >> immediately; this way, the "mistake" branch at any point in time will >> contain only closed leaves and therefore it will be itself closed and >> not shown among the active branches. >> >> To me, the concept of hidden branches appears to be a misfeature. _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
