On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 4:29 AM, Richard Hipp <d...@sqlite.org> wrote:
> I think (2) since that way we don't have to worry about causing accidental > collisions with preexisting custom pages when we add new built-in pages in > the future. > That's my conclusion as well. If we want them to be safely syncable, i think (2) is our only realistic option. Do the th1 additions i've made so far seem acceptable? Here's a quick demo: http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/artifact/379f9006ea3c43584925cc276e95c43f6d22e726 :-? -- ----- stephan beal http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/ http://gplus.to/sgbeal
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
