On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 7:18 PM, Scott Robison <sc...@scottrobison.us>wrote:
> fossil co --glob 154 > > Though I'm not personally looking for this functionality myself so not > having it as an official feature doesn't bother me. FWIW: as Richard said, it's _technically_ easy, but brings with it both philosophical and usability concerns. Fossil would need a way of allowing the user to disambiguate, e.g.: "possible matches: 1) ... 2) ... type number to continue..." and that type of feature would then arguably need to be added to other commands which deal with branches/tags. IMO a custom shell-based solution is the proper place for this. If it can be demonstrated that this is feasible, i'll stop being pessimistic about it ;). i suspect, however, that any attempt at doing so would reveal worms which haven't yet been mentioned. -- ----- stephan beal http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/ http://gplus.to/sgbeal
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
