Even if someone is still supporting Win9X, it does not necessarily follow that they are doing anything more that testing binaries in that environment. I would not be heartbroken if such support were removed.
SDR On Sep 13, 2012 8:25 AM, "Jan Danielsson" <jan.m.daniels...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 09/13/12 16:02, Richard Hipp wrote: > > Is there any reason to try to keep Fossil working on windows9x? > > I don't think much Win9x development goes on today. But even if I'm > wrong, I would guess that the intersection between the sets "Win9X > developers" and "Fossil users" is roughly empty. > > Tag last win95-compatible version so anyone so inclined can dig it up > easily, just in case? > > -- > Kind regards, > Jan Danielsson > > > > _______________________________________________ > fossil-users mailing list > fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org > http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users > >
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
