-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 10/09/2012 11:19 AM, Remigiusz Modrzejewski wrote:
> Actually... No. Fossil, with it's monolithic single-app design, is relatively > hard to both extend and embed. Also, seeing how Natacha's attempts at > providing a much-requested feature were ignored, it can be hard to influence. Is it time to fork Fossil? Richard has his own priorities, and if there's enough people who'd like to see Fossil go in a different direction, it would be perfectly honorouable for a fork that served different priorities to form in an amicable manner. As much as possible should be contributed to the original Fossil and then pulled into the fork, but the fork can accept direct contributions that Original Fossil won't. ABS - -- Alaric Snell-Pym http://www.snell-pym.org.uk/alaric/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAlB0AVgACgkQRgz/WHNxCGr2EQCfd0+wJw2Ox5kHNEzZuFJO96me vEwAniXvrCjgaD5DgBVOEhhibnQIcOhD =QgoL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
