On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 09:18:53PM -0500, Maxim Khitrov wrote: > I just started playing with fossil, but the lack of client SSL/TLS > support in the official binaries is a pretty major bump in the road > for production use. I've read all the topics that I could find on this > subject, and I understand the arguments, but this really gets in the > way of the "simply download a precompiled binary" idea. Please > consider building a separate set of binaries and letting the users > select which version they want to use.
The real way to get real support for TLS on Windows is to use native implementation (schannel). Beyond enabling xcopy deployments without also carrying the OpenSSL runtime of a matching version along with the binary, it would also enable using the system's certificate storage. _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
