j. v. d. hoff wrote:
>
> I find this a confounding proposal. 
>

Would you care to explain exactly what you find confounding about it?

It provides the requested functionality; however, it does so in a manner
that is respectful to those who are depending on the current functionality.

--
Joe Mistachkin

_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Reply via email to