On 12/18/12 22:50, j. v. d. hoff wrote: > the NetBSD example seems to indicate that fossil's has performance problems > for such projects with a massive code base. is this still the state of > affairs?
Last time I used my NetBSD fossil repository, it was still pretty much unusable. I don't think anything has changed on that front since then. I have a pretty high-powered PC, and it still takes a few hours for rebuilds. For a friend of mine, who has a Pentium3-class system, pulling latest changes and rebuilding the NetBSD fossil repository takes around ~24h each time. > not that this would matter for 99.9% of all projects. Definitely true. -- Kind regards, Jan Danielsson _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
