On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Stephan Beal <sgb...@googlemail.com> wrote:

>
> @DRH: please correct me if i'm wrong in assuming that documentation
> patches do not necessarily need the waiver?
>
>
The Contributor License Agreement (CLA) basically says:  "I recognize that
Fossil uses the two-clause BSD license and I hereby release my
changes/patches under that same license."

It would be good to have a CLA online for documentation changes in addition
to code changes, especially if the changes are large.  But I am not nearly
as strict about documentation as I am with code.  Small documentation
changes and/or typo fixes do not require a CLA.  But we would appreciate a
CLA from people who are doing major rewrites.


-- 
D. Richard Hipp
d...@sqlite.org
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Reply via email to