On 1/31/2013 2:02 PM, K. Fossil user wrote:
in another word it is not possible to link staticly...
For little project, no hardware acceleration devices does not hurt.
But, for projects that need secure connections with numerous users, it
will be crucial.
Let imagine accountants that need speed secure connections ...
Why don't fossil create a lite version that could be static and the
full one which will forbid the static option ?
Isn't that a good idea ?
I think that for static linking on Linux you may need to look at what
the embedded Linux folks are doing. I think the alternate libc
libraries (musl libc, uclibc, dietlibc, etc.) have static linking as an
explicit design goal.
--
Edward Berner
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
