On 20-3-2013 9:33, Jan Nijtmans wrote:
2013/3/20 Joe Mistachkin <sql...@mistachkin.com>:
Actually, given the variety of possible text encodings, we know
very little with absolute certainty.
That's true. The fact that NUL is no valid character in any
text encoding is an absolute certainty, but other assumptions
cannot be made.
Hm... NUL as a *character* might be invalid, NUL as a *byte* is
perfectly valid, in UTF-16 at the least.
Not certain which one you meant there.
--
Martijn Coppoolse
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
