On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Stephan Beal <sgb...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 10:52 PM, James Masters > <james.d.mast...@gmail.com>wrote > But this is not so with "stash" - it just goes in whether there is a >> message or not. I'm not sure if this is considered a bug or a feature... >> but I wanted to let you all know in case you didn't already. >> > > FWIW, i consider that a feature. For checkins (which are public/shared) > its generally considered rude to leave empty commit messages, but for a > local stash it's not a big deal (until you forget which stash is which, but > then it's your own fault ;). > > Also, check-ins are persistent and irrevocable whereas stashes are temporary and ephemeral. If you create an incorrect check-in, you live with it forever. But if you create a bad stash, you just do "fossil stash rm" to remove it. -- D. Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
