On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 05:24:29PM -0400, Martin Gagnon wrote: > On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 10:32:26PM +0200, Rene wrote: > > On 2013-07-10 21:31, Martin Gagnon wrote: > > >On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 01:51:05AM -0600, Andy Bradford wrote: > > >>Folks, > > >> > > >>As I mentioned before, I've been attempting some modifications > > >>to the > > >>fossil SSH URL handling. I'm at a point where I could use some > > >>feedback > > >>regarding the previous method for handling SSH. > > >> > > > [snip] > > > > > > > > >I like the idea to have new ssh implementation that don't depend on > > >shell and to have capability to use ssh protocol without using > > >accounts > > >with shell access. But I think there's still have some work and test > > >that need to be done on this implementation. > > > > > >I tried your patch, I don't know if I'm missing something but it > > >doesn't work for me... I made a simple test in the same way I was > > >using > > >ssh:// protocol before, without using SSH keys restrictions and I got > > >following results: > > > > > > 1- Some new line are missing when asking for password, so I'm > > > typing password over the first line of sync status output. > > > > > > (I guess this is not a problem when using ssh keys > > > but output should still be correct when using > > > password) > > > > > > 2- Clone return with no warning or error right away with 0 > > > artifact sent and 0 artifact received and I end up with a > > > empty fossil file and a fossil-journal file.. > > > > > > (On OpenBSD 5.3 amd64) > > > > > >Exact same command with non-patched fossil work. > > On linux (arch) it works. Now if i lower my credentials i'm not > > allowed to write! > > > > I had no problem typing the password. even if i botch my first one! > > fossil clone > > ssh://renez@arch:22/src/fossil/myclone.fossil?fossil=bin/fssh > > new2.fsl > > ssh -e none -T renez@arch > > renez@arch's password: > > Permission denied, please try again. > > renez@arch's password: > > Round-trips: 6 Artifacts sent: 0 received: 21510 > > Clone finished with 1592 bytes sent, 28967314 bytes received > > Killed by signal 2. > > Rebuilding repository meta-data... > > 100.0% complete... > > project-id: CE59BB9F186226D80E49D1FA2DB29F935CCA0333 > > admin-user: renez (password is "4b8994") > > > > Cloning the repo work with orignal fossil using http:// protocol, so > nobody can clone it.. Here some experiments: > > - try 1: normal fossil, clone throught http: > ----------------------------------------- > me@myserver(~/test) > $ fossil clone http://10.0.0.1/repo/common common1.fossil > Round-trips: 12 Artifacts sent: 0 received: 3120 > Clone finished with 2888 bytes sent, 75949538 bytes received > Rebuilding repository meta-data... > 100.0% complete... > project-id: fae69cd7d6c31a88295fa9c9d984b9483faac0ac > admin-user: me (password is "6e3c63") > > - try 2: normal fossil, clone throught ssh: > ----------------------------------------- > me@myserver(~/test) > $ fossil clone ssh://me@10.0.0.1//fossil/common.fossil common2.fossil > > ssh -e none -T me@10.0.0.1 > me@10.0.0.1's password: > Round-trips: 12 Artifacts sent: 0 received: 3157 > Clone finished with 2994 bytes sent, 75953950 bytes received > Rebuilding repository meta-data... > 100.0% complete... > project-id: fae69cd7d6c31a88295fa9c9d984b9483faac0ac > admin-user: me (password is "4ff602") > > - try 3: patched fossil, clone throught ssh: > ----------------------------------------- > (Notice on output that it ask password on same line as sync status > output, but we can see that artifact received and sent are 0) > $ fossil2 clone ssh://me@10.0.0.1//fossil/common.fossil common3.fossil > ssh -e none -T me@10.0.0.1 fossil http /fossil/common.fossil > me@10.0.0.1's password: nt: 0 received: 0 > > Now, if I list my 3 cloned repos: > (common3.fossil have the journal file and is a lot smaller that it > should be..) > me@myserver(~/test) > $ ls -ltrh > total 336800 > -rw-r--r-- 1 me me 79.7M Jul 10 17:11 common.fossil > -rw-r--r-- 1 me me 79.7M Jul 10 17:13 common2.fossil > -rw-r--r-- 1 me me 14.5K Jul 10 17:13 common3.fossil-journal > -rw-r--r-- 1 me me 4.7M Jul 10 17:13 common3.fossil > > -- > Martin G.
Sorry, *my* mistake.. I didn't notice the new version of the patch on latest Andy Bradford email. My test was made with the previous patch. Work fine now.. sorry for the noise.. -- Martin G. _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
