On Jul 17, 2013 12:58 AM, "Stephan Beal" <sgb...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 12:35 AM, B Harder <brad.har...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Of top of head, reflexive position is that week numbers are running in wrong order, but if it's reversed, latest would be at bottom of page. > > > i sorted them DESC because i _suspect_ the most common use case will be checking the current week. That's pure speculation, though, and i'm not emotionally attached to the current (reverse) sorting. > >> >> That made me wonder though, what of vertical bars vs. horizontal? > > Do you mean run the week numbers horizontally and "count bars" vertically?
Yes. If the width of the bars was more narrow, obviously more could fit, or alternatively, instead of bars, perhaps a line graph, showing the general shape. I'm just throwing out unedited ideas ;) What you've got is already cool, so take these ideas FWTW. > When the week has 53 years that list gets really wide. When i had the week list as part of the byyear view it was wrapping almost twice for most years in the main fossil repo. > > -- > ----- stephan beal > http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/ > http://gplus.to/sgbeal > > _______________________________________________ > fossil-users mailing list > fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org > http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users >
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
