On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Mark Janssen <mpc.jans...@gmail.com>wrote:

> I would just like to add that fossil already has a defined "API" in the
> sense that what a fossil repo and server are is described in
> http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/doc/trunk/www/fileformat.wiki and
> http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/doc/trunk/www/sync.wiki. I would say
> that any truly useful fossil library should be built on those concepts.
>

i was recently wondering (haven't checked) whether the sync really belongs
in the core lib or if networking is an app-level detail? The file
format/manifest will (must) remain central to the design, and i started
sketching out interfaces for working with the manifests.

-- 
----- stephan beal
http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/
http://gplus.to/sgbeal
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Reply via email to