On 28/07/2013, at 8:53 AM, Paolo Bolzoni <paolo.bolzoni.br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Marketing I am afraid ... ... > Of course whoever is interested in selling other languages will mark the C++ > way as older. I respectfully disagree, strongly. Some OO languages support greater degrees of introspection and dynamic type checking than others. Some encourage delegation, dynamic binding and dispatch, whether classes are part of the object system, whether the class of classes can be subclassed, etc., these differences are really fundamental things. One thing I appreciate about Tcl is that I can choose which type of OO suits my needs, or none at all (sometimes an OO system gets in the way of a clean solution). But, in summary, the main difference in OO systems is the degree to which they support dynamic "stuff" and whether they support delegation. _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
